the female homo sapiens is the only mammal in nature, with the breasts and then a bounce if he does not breastfeed. what exactly is the purpose?
we consider this question from an evolutionary view, the woman is sending some signals. a full breast is to show the man that they care for their offspring well and provide best she can. biologically, this is not correct. after all, says nothing about the size of health, maternal gebärdefreudigkeit or the woman. Scientists are not even agree on whether large or small breasts drink suitable for children to be better.
a purely sexual one would think that a large bosom increases the loss of the man. So it might be possible that he is used purely as a lure. is also not true though. a large bust is indicative of a relatively high amount of female hormones estrogen and a rather low testosterone levels. much testosterone, however, increases a woman's desire. It would therefore have little effect on male breast exciting.
address some scientists outstrip even a kind of distraction, such as butterflies also have relatively large eyes on. This eye-catching is the female lead and a corresponding advantage over the males. but the spirit really does not even now.
is the bosom that is actually unnecessary?
even if neither the nature nor the scientific a valid reason for a full neckline and this has weder sexuell noch evolutionär eine rolle spielt, ist er vom weiblichen körper nicht wegzudenken.
kinder lieben sie, frauen auch und von uns männern brauche ich ja wohl kaum zu reden. und sind wir uns doch mal ehrlich, wer braucht beim anblick solcher prachtexemplare eine wissenschaftliche erklärung über das wieso und warum?
so, haben wir wieder was gelernt.
ihr/euer
krusty
0 comments:
Post a Comment